set_track_pan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so the description carries full burden. It only states the basic action without disclosing side effects, permission needs, or behavior with automation. Minimal disclosure beyond the operation itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with a clear list of parameters. Front-loaded with the action. Slightly redundant 'Parameters:' header, but overall efficient and no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameter-setting tool with output schema (though not shown), the description is adequate. It covers the basic purpose and parameter details, though missing context like return values or interaction with automation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description compensates. It explains track_index as 0-based and pan range from -1.0 to 1.0, adding clarity beyond the schema's property titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool sets track panning position, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like set_track_volume by explicitly mentioning 'panning'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like set_track_volume or set_track_balance. The description implies use for panning but does not provide when/when-not criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.