build_session_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It states it creates tracks, loads effects, sets properties—indicative of a write operation. However, it does not mention limitations, error conditions, or whether prior session state is affected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-organized: a summary paragraph followed by parameter details. Every sentence adds value, no redundancy. Example enhances clarity without extra length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (3 parameters, nested objects), the description provides nearly all necessary context. The example illustrates usage. Only minor nuance like data types for color/volume could be added, but overall complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description fully compensates. It explains each parameter: bpm, time_sig, and track_configs with nested fields (name, color, effects, volume, send_a) and an example, adding substantial meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a complete session template with tracks, effects, and settings. The verb 'Build' and resource 'session template' are specific. It distinguishes from sibling tools like set_tempo or create_audio_track by being a batch operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'quickest way to set up a new session,' implying primary use case. It does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternatives, but given sibling tools, the intent is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.