fire_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action (start playing) without mentioning permissions, side effects, error conditions, or what the tool returns. Minimal disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two lines of description plus parameter list. Key information is front-loaded with the verb and context. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema (not shown) which reduces burden on description for return values. However, description does not mention what happens after firing (e.g., clip starts, any confirmation). Adequate for a simple action but could include error cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds the 0-based indexing context for both parameters, which is not in the schema (only integer type). Schema coverage is 0%, so description compensates partially, but lacks range or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'fire' with explanation 'start playing' and the resource 'a clip in Session View'. It distinguishes the tool from 'stop_clip' but does not differentiate from the sibling 'fire_clip_slot', which seems similar.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'fire_clip_slot', 'stop_clip', or 'stop_all_clips'. No prerequisites or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.