set_clip_warp_mode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The tool has no annotations, and the description does not disclose any behavioral implications of setting the warp mode, such as whether it affects playback, requires the clip to be warped first, or has side effects on audio processing. This leaves significant gaps for the agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two short sentences, each serving a clear purpose (purpose statement and value mapping). However, it could be slightly expanded to cover parameter context without losing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of clip manipulation and the rich set of sibling tools, the description lacks completeness. It does not explain how warp mode interacts with other clip settings, nor does it describe the output schema or confirm the operation's idempotence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only the 'mode' parameter receives explanation via value mapping. The 'track_index' and 'clip_index' parameters are not described, and with 0% schema coverage, the description fails to compensate adequately. Agents may infer their purpose from the tool name, but explicit guidance is missing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function ('Set clip warp mode') and provides a mapping of integer values to mode names. It is specific and distinguishes from general 'set_clip' operations, though it does not explicitly differentiate from closely related siblings like set_clip_warping.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., set_clip_warping for toggling warping, or other set_clip_* tools). The description lacks context on prerequisites or typical usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.