clyphx_global

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description should fully disclose behavior. It does not mention side effects, prerequisites, error handling, or return values. As a tool that can change global state (playback, record, etc.), this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the purpose and then lists actions in a readable format. It is reasonably concise given the need to document many possibilities, though a more structured layout (e.g., grouping actions) could improve scannability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has moderate complexity with many sibling tools, minimal schema, and no annotations. The description lacks output information, error behavior, and detailed usage context. It is incomplete for an agent to reliably invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has a single 'action' parameter with no description or enum, but the description compensates by listing many valid action strings and their meanings. This provides significant guidance beyond the schema, though syntax for parameterized actions could be clearer.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool executes ClyphX Pro global actions and lists many examples. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools that provide dedicated functions for the same actions (e.g., set_tempo, set_metronome).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternative sibling tools. The description only lists actions without advising on selection criteria or when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.