KeyShot MCP

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

Check KeyShot MCP status

keyshot_status

Read-onlyIdempotent

Diagnose local KeyShot installation and check output access, presets, bridge files, and headless startup without altering a scene.

Instructions

Diagnose the local installation, output access, presets, bridge files, and a minimal KeyShot headless startup without modifying a user scene.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`ok`	Yes	True when the requested operation completed successfully.
`data`	Yes	Operation-specific structured result data, or null when unavailable.
`error`	Yes	Human-readable failure reason, or null after success.
`warnings`	Yes	Non-fatal conditions the user or agent should review.
`errorCode`	No	Stable error category for common failures.
`outputFiles`	Yes	Absolute paths of images or scene files created by the operation.
`suggestions`	No	Actionable recovery steps for the user or agent.
`keyshotStdoutTail`	Yes	Truncated tail of KeyShot headless output for diagnostics.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed4 schema fields changedv0.13.0Sep 30, 2026

changedInput schema / $schema

Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"

removedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```

changedOutput schema / $schema

Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"

changedOutput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "ok",
-  "outputFiles",
-  "warnings",
-  "keyshotStdoutTail",
-  "error"
-]New value: +[
+  "ok",
+  "data",
+  "outputFiles",
+  "warnings",
+  "keyshotStdoutTail",
+  "error"
+]

Changed2 schema fields changedv0.10.0Aug 11, 2026

addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {},
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ],
+      "description": "Operation-specific structured result data, or null when unavailable."
+    },
+    "error": {
+      "description": "Human-readable failure reason, or null after success.",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "errorCode": {
+      "description": "Stable error category for common failures.",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "keyshotStdoutTail": {
+      "description": "Truncated tail of KeyShot headless output for diagnostics.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "ok": {
+      "description": "True when the requested operation completed successfully.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "outputFiles": {
+      "description": "Absolute paths of images or scene files created by the operation.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "suggestions": {
+      "description": "Actionable recovery steps for the user or agent.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "warnings": {
+      "description": "Non-fatal conditions the user or agent should review.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "ok",
+    "outputFiles",
+    "warnings",
+    "keyshotStdoutTail",
+    "error"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedv0.2.1Jul 9, 2026

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely non-obvious context beyond those: it performs a 'minimal KeyShot headless startup' yet does so 'without modifying a user scene', which tells the agent a process launch occurs as part of a supposedly read-only check.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with the verb first and the checked areas enumerated compactly. No filler, no restatement of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need no explanation, and the description fully covers what is probed and confirms the non-destructive guarantee. The only gap is the absence of guidance on when this check should be triggered relative to the render siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the schema imposes no semantic burden and the baseline of 4 applies. Nothing in the description conflicts with the empty parameter object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (diagnose) and enumerates the exact resources checked: installation, output access, presets, bridge files, and headless startup. This clearly separates it from every sibling, which are render/scene/material/camera operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The diagnostic framing implies this is a pre-flight/health-check tool, but the description never states when to run it (before renders? on failure?) or names any alternative. Usage must be inferred from the name and scope.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.