keyshot_save_scene
Save a KeyShot scene to a specified output path. Use this to create backups or duplicate scenes.
Instructions
Save a KeyShot scene to a new path.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenePath | Yes | ||
| outputScenePath | Yes |
Save a KeyShot scene to a specified output path. Use this to create backups or duplicate scenes.
Save a KeyShot scene to a new path.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenePath | Yes | ||
| outputScenePath | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Save' without explaining whether it overwrites existing files, what happens on failure, or if any state is changed. Missing critical behavioral details for a file-saving operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it lacks structure and detail. It earns its place by being short, but at the cost of completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With two simple string parameters and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It does not cover return behavior, error conditions, or file format expectations. Given the complexity (low), the description should still provide more actionable context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain the purpose or expected format of scenePath (source) or outputScenePath (destination). The phrase 'to a new path' hints at outputScenePath but adds no semantic value beyond the parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Save' and the resource 'KeyShot scene' with a target 'to a new path'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like keyshot_render and keyshot_batch_render which are for rendering, not file saving.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites, when saving is appropriate, or when another tool like keyshot_export might be more suitable. The description is purely declarative.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/truman-t3/keyshot-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server