boondmanager-mcp-server

Rechercher des logs

boond_logs_search

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search BoondManager audit logs to trace user actions: who changed what and when. Filter by keywords and paginate results.

Instructions

Recherche des logs d'audit dans BoondManager (historique des actions utilisateurs).

Quand : pour retracer qui a modifié quoi et quand. Plutôt que : le _get du domaine concerné (boond_candidates_get, boond_projects_get…) pour l'état actuel d'un enregistrement : celui-ci ne renvoie que l'historique des modifications.

Returns: Liste des logs correspondants.

fields : projection côté MCP, jamais transmise à l'API — remplace le résumé par les seuls attributs/relations listés (noms inconnus ignorés). À utiliser sur les grosses pages.
Pagination : pageSize 1–500 (défaut 30), page 1–100 — au-delà : refus, affiner les filtres.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`page`	No	Numéro de page (défaut: 1, max: 100)
`fields`	No	Projection : attributs ou relations (type#id) par résultat (ex: ['title','dependsOn']). Absent = résumé standard. Noms inconnus ignorés.
`keywords`	No	Mots-clés de recherche (nom, email, compétences...)
`pageSize`	No	Nombre de résultats par page (max: 500, défaut: 30)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`count`	Yes	Nombre d'éléments retournés sur cette page
`items`	Yes
`total`	No	Nombre total de résultats côté BoondManager

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedv2.18.0Oct 2, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / fields / description

Previous value: -"Projection : attributs à afficher par résultat (ex: ['title','updateDate']). Absent = résumé standard. Noms inconnus ignorés."New value: +"Projection : attributs ou relations (type#id) par résultat (ex: ['title','dependsOn']). Absent = résumé standard. Noms inconnus ignorés."

Changed2 schema fields changedv2.12.2Aug 14, 2026

removedInput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

removedOutput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

Changed1 schema field changedv2.9.0Aug 3, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / fields

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Projection : attributs à afficher par résultat (ex: ['title','updateDate']). Absent = résumé standard. Noms inconnus ignorés.",
+  "items": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

Changed1 schema field changedv2.7.0Jun 19, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "count": {
+      "description": "Nombre d'éléments retournés sur cette page",
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "items": {
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "attributes": {
+            "additionalProperties": {},
+            "description": "Attributs projetés (présent si `fields` est fourni)",
+            "propertyNames": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "id": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "summary": {
+            "description": "Résumé standard (absent si `fields` est fourni)",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "type": {
+            "type": "string"
+          }
+        },
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "total": {
+      "description": "Nombre total de résultats côté BoondManager",
+      "type": "number"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "count",
+    "items"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedv2.1.0May 30, 2026

TDQS

A4.8/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only/idempotent/non-destructive, but the description adds non-obvious behavior: `fields` is an MCP-side projection never sent to the API, unknown names are silently ignored, and pagination is hard-capped (pageSize 1–500 default 30, page 1–100) with requests beyond that refused rather than clamped.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded purpose followed by clearly labeled 'Quand', 'Plutôt que', 'Returns' and bullet sections; efficient overall, with only the near-empty 'Returns' line as filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only search tool with an output schema, full parameter documentation, and annotation coverage, the description supplies everything an agent needs: purpose, the alternative it replaces, projection semantics, and pagination limits.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description nonetheless adds meaning beyond the schema by explaining that `fields` is a client-side projection never transmitted to the API and recommending it for large pages, though its pagination notes largely restate the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Recherche des logs d'audit dans BoondManager') and clarifies the scope as the history of user actions, which cleanly separates it from the many *_search siblings and the *_get record readers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly gives the condition ('Quand : pour retracer qui a modifié quoi et quand') and names the alternatives to avoid (the domain `_get` tools such as boond_candidates_get / boond_projects_get) with the reason they differ (current state vs. change history). The only minor omission is not naming boond_logs_get.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server