dataverse_get_view

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description complements annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint) by detailing output structure: parsing FetchXml/LayoutXml, backup fields, and special handling for Quick Find views. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Five concise sentences, each adding unique information: purpose, parsing details, backup fields, Quick Find behavior, and sibling tool reference. No redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description covers purpose, usage, output specifics, and prerequisite. For a read-only tool with output schema, no critical gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions already clearly define view_id and dataverse_url parameters. Description does not add additional semantic meaning or constraints beyond what schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves a single Dataverse view's layout as structured JSON, with specific verb 'Get' and resource 'view'. It differentiates from sibling dataverse_list_views by explicitly advising to use that tool for discovery.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises using dataverse_list_views to discover view IDs, providing a clear prerequisite. Describes output features (columns, sort, filters, quick_find_fields) but lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance for other scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.