dataverse_export_solution

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and destructiveHint; the description adds valuable behavioral details: file size threshold (~3 MB), local I/O behavior, and clarification that no DATAVERSE_ALLOW_WRITE permission is needed for disk writes. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is succinct (two paragraphs) and front-loaded with the core purpose. Every sentence adds value, no redundant or verbose statements.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has many parameters and an output schema. The description covers the main behavioral aspect (inline vs disk) but does not explain the boolean flags for export settings. For a moderately complex tool, more parameter context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0%, the description must compensate. It only explains the output_path parameter and its inline/disk behavior. Other important parameters (solution_name, managed, export flags) are not described, leaving the agent to rely on schema descriptions alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Export a Dataverse solution as a base64-encoded zip.' It specifies the action (ExportSolution unbound action) and differentiates from sibling tools that are primarily 'get' or 'list' operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use output_path for large solutions and notes the tool is read-only. However, it does not explicitly exclude alternative tools or mention when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.