update_event_command

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states 'update' without disclosing behavioral traits such as whether it replaces the entire command, what happens on invalid index, or required permissions. With no annotations, the description carries full burden but fails to provide sufficient transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, but it omits critical details that would earn its length. It could be more informative without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 required params, nested objects) and lack of output schema, annotations, or param descriptions, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to provide enough context for correct tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage with 6 required parameters, and the description adds no meaning beyond their names. 'newCommand' is an object with no structure provided, leaving the agent unsure of its expected format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the action (update), resource (event command), and location (at specified index). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_event_command, though it could be more precise about the context within an event's page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_event_command, add_dialogue). No mention of prerequisites or context for using the index parameter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.