list_data_files
List all JSON data files in the project's data directory to locate and manage game data resources.
Instructions
List all JSON data files in the project's data directory
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes |
List all JSON data files in the project's data directory to locate and manage game data resources.
List all JSON data files in the project's data directory
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectPath | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states it lists files but does not disclose if recursive, filters, error behavior, or that it is read-only.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy, but could benefit from a brief usage note.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool, the description is adequate for basic understanding but lacks output schema and details on edge cases (e.g., empty directory, invalid path).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and description does not explain the 'projectPath' parameter beyond the generic schema name. No format, examples, or constraints given.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'JSON data files in the project's data directory'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_assets' (which may list non-JSON files) and 'read_data_file' (which reads content).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use versus alternatives like 'list_assets' or 'read_data_file'. No when-not-to-use or contextual hints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rein1225/RPGMakerMZ_MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server