get_logistics_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only lists data returned without disclosing behavioral traits such as read-only nature, error conditions (e.g., when no network exists), or performance implications. Minimal additional context beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single concise sentence that effectively communicates the tool's purpose. No unnecessary words, but lacks structured bullet points for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description gives a high-level overview but does not specify output format or structure; with no output schema, the agent may be uncertain about the response shape. Could be more complete given the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all three parameters; the tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what is in the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Get' and specific resource 'logistics network information' with concrete details like robot counts, items, and pending requests, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_electric_network.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; no prerequisites or exclusions mentioned. The description does not help the agent choose between this and similar get_* tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.