Skip to main content
Glama
PDF.co MCP Server

PDF.co MCP Server

Official
by pdfdotco

webpage_to_pdf

Convert an external webpage URL into a PDF document with customizable headers, footers, margins, and paper size.

Instructions

Convert external webpage URL to PDF.
Ref: https://developer.pdf.co/api/pdf-from-url.md

The header and footer parameters can contain valid HTML markup with the following classes used to inject printing values into them:
- date: formatted print date
- title: document title
- url: document location
- pageNumber: current page number
- totalPages: total pages in the document
- img: tag is supported in both the header and footer parameter, provided that the src attribute is specified as a base64-encoded string.
For example, the following markup will generate Page N of NN page numbering:
```html
<span style='font-size:10px'>Page <span class='pageNumber'></span> of <span class='totalPages'></span>.</span>

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesURL to the source file (external webpage URL).
nameNoFile name for the generated output. (Optional)
footerNoUser definable HTML for the footer to be applied on every page footer. (Optional)
headerNoUser definable HTML for the header to be applied on every page header. (Optional)
api_keyNoPDF.co API key. If not provided, will use X_API_KEY environment variable. (Optional)
marginsNoSet to CSS style margins like 10px, 5mm, 5in for all sides or 5px 5px 5px 5px (the order of margins is top, right, bottom, left). (Optional)
profilesNoExtra engine options for this endpoint as a JSON object encoded in a string. The options differ per endpoint; see https://developer.pdf.co/api/profiles. (Optional)
mediaTypeNoUses print by default. Set to screen to convert HTML as it appears in a browser or print to convert as it appears for printing or none to set none as mediaType for CSS styles. (Optional)
paperSizeNoA4 is set by default. Can be Letter, Legal, Tabloid, Ledger, A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6 or a custom size. Custom size can be set in px (pixels), mm or in (inches) with width and height separated by space like this: 200 300, 200px 300px, 200mm 300mm, 20cm 30cm or 6in 8in. (Optional)
expirationNoLifetime of the output link in minutes; the output file is deleted afterwards. API default is 60; the maximum depends on the plan. (Optional)
orientationNoSet to Portrait or Landscape. Portrait is set by default. (Optional)
httppasswordNoHTTP auth password if required to access source url. (Optional)
httpusernameNoHTTP auth user name if required to access source url. (Optional)
printBackgroundNotrue by default. Set to false to disable printing of background. (Optional)
DoNotWaitFullLoadNofalse by default. Set to true to skip waiting for full load (like full video load etc. that may affect the total conversion time). (Optional)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.0.11
    • addedInput schema / properties / expiration
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Lifetime of the output link in minutes; the output file is deleted afterwards. API default is 60; the maximum depends on the plan. (Optional)",
      +  "title": "Expiration"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / profiles
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "description": "Extra engine options for this endpoint as a JSON object encoded in a string. The options differ per endpoint; see https://developer.pdf.co/api/profiles. (Optional)",
      +  "title": "Profiles",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It adds useful detail about header/footer HTML templating and base64 image support, but omits critical behavior: what the tool returns (file, link, job ID), whether conversion is synchronous or asynchronous, authentication behavior beyond schema, and output file lifetime.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence. The header/footer explanation and code example are relevant and earn their place, though the section is somewhat lengthy and a reference link is included without much framing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The schema is rich with 100% parameter description coverage, and the header/footer semantics are well covered. However, with no output schema, the description should explain return values or async job behavior, and it does not. An agent cannot tell from this description whether the call returns a PDF directly, a URL, or a job identifier.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description goes beyond the schema for the complex header and footer parameters by explaining supported HTML classes, base64 image constraints, and giving a concrete example. It does not elaborate on other complex parameters like profiles or paperSize, but the schema documents those adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb and resource: convert an external webpage URL to PDF. It implies differentiation from html_to_pdf by specifying 'external webpage URL', but does not explicitly name or contrast with sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the first sentence: this tool should be used when the source is an external webpage URL. However, there is no explicit guidance on when to prefer this over html_to_pdf or document_to_pdf, and no exclusions or prerequisites are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.