Get bill
clio_get_billRetrieve a specific bill from Clio Manage by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Returns a single bill by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bill_id | Yes |
clio_get_billRetrieve a specific bill from Clio Manage by providing its unique ID.
Returns a single bill by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bill_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare the tool as read-only and idempotent. The description does not contradict these and adds basic safety context. No extra behavioral details, but the bar is lowered due to annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, compact sentence with no wasted words. It conveys the essential information efficiently.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With only one required parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly adequate. However, it could mention what fields are returned or if the bill is fully expanded.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only says 'by id' without clarifying the format or constraints of the bill_id parameter. This is insufficient for an agent to construct the parameter correctly.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Returns') and the resource ('a single bill') with the required parameter ('by id'). It distinguishes from sibling list tools like clio_list_bills.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Context signals suggest siblings like clio_list_bills and clio_get_billing_summary, but no when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/patrickking67/clio-manage-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server