update_required_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description only states 'Update', implying mutation. It does not disclose side effects, permission requirements, or whether the update is partial or full replacement. No behavioral details beyond the verb.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) with no extraneous words. Conciseness is good, but the extreme brevity limits usefulness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, error conditions, or whether the update replaces or merges data. Given the complexity of the action_data object, more detail is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters, so description adds no extra meaning. The field names are clear, but the description does not explain the structure or constraints of 'action_data'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'required action', and specifies the identifier 'by alias', distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete, get, or register. However, it lacks context on what aspects of the action are updated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as update_required_action_config or create/delete operations. There are no prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.