delete_realm_role
Delete a specified role from a Keycloak realm by providing the realm name and role name.
Instructions
Delete a realm role.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| realm | Yes | Realm name | |
| role_name | Yes | Role name |
Delete a specified role from a Keycloak realm by providing the realm name and role name.
Delete a realm role.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| realm | Yes | Realm name | |
| role_name | Yes | Role name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks any behavioral details beyond the action itself. For a delete operation, it does not disclose irreversibility, required permissions, or side effects like cascade deletion of role mappings or composites. No annotations are provided to compensate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), which is concise but lacks essential context. It is front-loaded but under-specified for a delete tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (2 params, no output schema), the description is too minimal. It fails to explain impact, such as removal of role assignments or how it differs from similar deletion tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters, so the description adds no extra meaning. Baseline of 3 is appropriate; the description does not clarify constraints or formats beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'a realm role', which is specific and distinguishes it from other sibling tools like delete_client_role or delete_role_by_id, though it does not explicitly contrast them.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as delete_role_by_id or delete_client_role. There is no mention of prerequisites, consequences, or context for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/paoloamato2/keycloak-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server