delete_organization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description fails to disclose important behavioral traits for a destructive operation, such as irreversibility, cascading deletions of members or roles, or required permissions. With no annotations, the description must compensate, but it does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (4 words), which is efficient but at the expense of informativeness. It earns its place but could be expanded slightly without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive nature and the existence of many sibling delete tools, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain the return behavior, the effect on related entities, or any prerequisites. Complete lack of context for safe usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for both realm and org_id, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, but schema coverage is high.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete an organization' clearly identifies the verb and resource, making the core action obvious. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like delete_realm or delete_group, which also delete entities. A more specific definition of what 'organization' entails would improve clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as delete_realm or delete_client. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, consequences, or typical scenarios for deletion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.