get_users_management_permissions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations given. Description only states the action without disclosing behavioral traits like read-only nature, potential restrictions, or response complexity. The burden falls on description but it adds nothing beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise but lacks any structuring for clarity. It is adequate for a simple tool but could benefit from additional context or formatting.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema provided; description does not explain what the response contains (e.g., list of permissions, structure). Given the simplicity of parameters, more detail on return value would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'realm' is fully described in the schema ('Realm name'). Description doesn't add additional meaning, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Get' and resource 'users management permissions for the realm'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_group_management_permissions by specifying 'users' and 'realm'. However, it lacks details on what exactly 'users management permissions' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_group_management_permissions or get_client_management_permissions. No exclusions or contextual hints provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.