get_role_by_id_realm_composites

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. The description does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, read-only nature, authorization needs, or any side effects. An agent cannot infer safety or retry behavior from this text.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is direct and front-loads the purpose. It is appropriately sized for a simple retrieval tool, though it could include more context without sacrificing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval with two well-described parameters, the description is functional but lacks details about the output or any optional parameters. Since no output schema exists, the agent cannot anticipate the response format, which reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters having descriptions. The description adds no extra meaning beyond restating the parameters implicitly. A baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema already does the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the resource ('realm-level composites of a role by ID'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_role_by_id (basic role info) and get_role_by_id_client_composites (client-level). However, the term 'realm-level composites' may be opaque to some agents without domain knowledge.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_realm_role_composites or get_role_by_id_composites. No contexts, exclusions, or prerequisites are mentioned, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name and sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.