update_numbering_serie

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it only says the serie is 'existing'. It does not disclose whether this is a partial or full update, whether omitted fields are preserved, permission requirements, or side effects such as changing numbering sequences.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single compact sentence with the verb and resource front-loaded and no filler. It is efficient, though its brevity contributes to the missing behavioral detail rather than resolving it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a five-parameter mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too thin. The schema documents field meanings fully, but nothing covers update semantics, conflict handling for nextNumber, or expected response behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with every parameter, including the docType enum and required serieId, documented in the input schema. The description adds no parameter semantics beyond what the schema already states, which is acceptable at this coverage level.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb (Update) and resource (numbering serie), and the '(Holded API v2)' suffix scopes it to the correct API. It distinguishes itself from create/get/delete_numbering_serie by the verb alone, though it never names those siblings explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus create_numbering_serie or get_numbering_series, no prerequisites, and no mention of what happens if a serie ID does not exist. The agent is left to infer context from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.