MCP Holded
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Holded
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Holded invoicing and treasury management, enabling creation and management of invoices, purchases, estimates, contacts, bank accounts, and cashflow forecasts.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Holded API v2, enabling listing and querying of contacts, invoices, purchases, products, services, and payments, with low-level access to any endpoint.15241 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for SuperFaktura invoicing system. Enables AI assistants to interact with SuperFaktura API for managing invoices, clients, and expenses.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that connects Claude Code to the Holded API for natural language financial, accounting, and invoicing queries, with built-in Spanish PGC context.132Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceHosted MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, and expenses via the Invox API, supporting actions like drafting, sending, cancelling, and marking invoices as paid, as well as logging expenses and updating client information.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Invoice Ninja v5 API. Enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, quotes, payments, and time tracking through natural language.3219 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 78 tools
Each tool targets a specific entity and action, with detailed descriptions that clarify potential overlaps (e.g., list_expenses_accounts vs get_chart_of_accounts, list_payments vs get_document_payments). The distinctions are clear, so an agent can reliably select the correct tool.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_contact, list_documents, update_product). Even compound actions like attach_file_to_document use a predictable structure. No mixing of styles or vague verbs.
With 78 tools, the server is comprehensive but slightly heavy. However, the number is justified by the breadth of ERP entities covered (contacts, documents, products, payments, accounting, etc.) and the inclusion of both basic CRUD and specialized operations (shipping, pipeline tracking).
The tool surface covers most core ERP operations: full CRUD for major entities, document workflows (pay, send, ship, attach), accounting (chart, ledger, taxes), and time tracking read. Minor gaps exist, such as missing create/update for projects and lack of user management, but the overall coverage is strong.