create_numbering_serie

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden, yet it says nothing about side effects, whether serie names must be unique per docType, what happens on conflict, or what permissions are required. Only the word "Create" signals a mutation, which the tool name already conveys.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence, but it is under-specified rather than efficient — there is no front-loaded detail an agent could act on and the parenthetical adds no operational value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a four-parameter mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should at minimum explain what is created and any constraints or return shape. It provides none of that, leaving the agent to rely solely on schema field names.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with all four parameters (name, prefix, docType, nextNumber) documented in the schema including a full enum for docType. The description adds no semantics beyond that, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a verb and resource ("Create a new numbering serie"), so the basic action is identifiable, but it adds nothing beyond what the tool name already says and does not distinguish it from siblings such as get_numbering_series, update_numbering_serie, or delete_numbering_serie. The parenthetical "(Holded API v2)" is provenance, not purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to create a serie versus updating an existing one, no mention of prerequisites (e.g., that docType determines which documents the serie applies to), and no reference to any alternative tool. The agent must infer usage entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.