Skip to main content
Glama
mohamedarif-m

IBM Content Services MCP Server

unfile_document

Unfiles a document from a folder in the content repository using the folder and document identifiers.

Instructions

Unfile a document from a folder in the content repository. This tool interfaces with the GraphQL API to unfile document from folder with the provided ids.

:param folder_id_or_path string Yes The unique identifier or path for the folder. If not provided, an error will be returned. :param document_id string Yes The unique identifier for the document. If not provided, an error will be returned.

:returns: If successful, return the folder id. Else, return a ToolError instance that describes the error.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
folder_id_or_pathYes
document_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions interfacing with GraphQL API and return value (folder id or ToolError) but does not disclose side effects, permissions, or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is efficient but uses a docstring format that adds some verbosity. Each sentence provides value, though it could be slightly more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and partial schema coverage, the description covers basic input/output but lacks details on preconditions, postconditions, and edge cases. Output schema exists but is not shown; description gives minimal return info.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description explains each parameter's meaning ('unique identifier or path for the folder' and 'unique identifier for the document') and notes that errors occur if not provided, adding value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Unfile a document from a folder') and the resource ('content repository'). The verb 'unfile' and specific resource distinguish it from siblings like 'file_document'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., file_document, delete_document). Lacks context for prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mohamedarif-m/filenet-mcp-localfile'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server