get_label
Retrieve a label using its ID to access specific lead record tags.
Instructions
Get a label
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ID of the label to retrieve |
Retrieve a label using its ID to access specific lead record tags.
Get a label
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ID of the label to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. Description adds no further behavioral context beyond 'get', which is consistent with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Overly brief; two words add no value beyond the tool name. While concise, fails to provide informative content that earns its length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks mention of return type, error conditions, or context about when label retrieval is appropriate given the many label-related tools. Annotations partially compensate, but description is incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema provides full description for the 'id' parameter (100% coverage). Description does not add extra meaning beyond what schema already conveys.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Get a label' is a tautology of the tool name; it does not specify scope or distinguish from siblings like 'get_labels' or other get_ functions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_labels' for multiple labels or 'add_label_to_order' for association operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/martijnpieters/eduframe-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server