eduframe-mcp

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

While the description does not contradict the annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint), it adds zero behavioral context beyond them. No information about return values, error conditions (e.g., 404 if ID not found), or side effects is provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at four words with no filler. While appropriately front-loaded, the brevity borders on under-specification given the available sibling tools.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite being a simple read operation with good annotations, the description fails to leverage the available complexity budget. It omits output structure, error scenarios, and differentiation from the plural 'get_accounts', leaving significant gaps in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage ('ID of the account to retrieve'), the baseline is met. The description itself does not mention parameters, but the schema fully compensates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a single account' restates the tool name with the modifier 'single', which distinguishes it from the sibling 'get_accounts'. However, it remains tautological and minimal, barely clearing the threshold of specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this single-record fetch versus the bulk 'get_accounts', nor are prerequisites (like needing a valid ID) mentioned. The agent receives no decision-making criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.