eduframe-mcp

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

While the description does not contradict the annotations (destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true, readOnlyHint=false), it adds no behavioral context beyond what the annotations already provide. It fails to clarify whether deletion is permanent, if recovery is possible, or what side effects occur.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief ('Delete a comment.'), which prevents bloat, but the single sentence merely restates the function name without adding actionable intelligence. It is front-loaded but wasteful in terms of information density.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple single-parameter structure and complete schema coverage, the description meets minimum viability. However, as a destructive operation, it lacks important context about irreversibility, cascading effects, or authorization requirements that would make it fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage ('ID of the comment to delete'), the schema adequately documents the parameter. The description adds no additional semantic meaning regarding the ID format or constraints, warranting the baseline score for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Delete') and resource ('comment'), accurately describing the operation. However, it does not differentiate from sibling delete operations (e.g., delete_task, delete_grade) beyond the resource name inherent in the function name itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_comment (for editing instead of removing), nor does it mention prerequisites such as ownership requirements or administrative permissions needed to delete comments.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.