Skip to main content
Glama
marco-looy

Pega DX MCP Server

by marco-looy

delete_related_case

Delete a related case association from a primary case. Provide both case IDs to remove the relationship.

Instructions

Remove related work association between two cases by deleting a specific relationship

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
caseIDYesPrimary case ID from which to remove the related case. Example: "ON6E5R-DIYRecipe-Work-RecipeCollection R-1008". a complete case identifier including spaces and special characters.
related_caseIDYesRelated case ID to be removed from the primary case. Example: "ON6E5R-DIYRecipe-Work-RecipeCollection R-1009". a complete case identifier including spaces and special characters.
sessionCredentialsNoOptional session-specific credentials. If not provided, uses environment variables. Supports two authentication modes: (1) OAuth mode - provide baseUrl, clientId, and clientSecret, or (2) Token mode - provide baseUrl and accessToken.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.0.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / caseID / description
      Previous value: -"Primary case ID from which to remove the related case. Example: \"ON6E5R-DIYRecipe-Work-RecipeCollection R-1008\". Must be a complete case identifier including spaces and special characters."New value: +"Primary case ID from which to remove the related case. Example: \"ON6E5R-DIYRecipe-Work-RecipeCollection R-1008\". a complete case identifier including spaces and special characters."
    • changedInput schema / properties / related_caseID / description
      Previous value: -"Related case ID to be removed from the primary case. Example: \"ON6E5R-DIYRecipe-Work-RecipeCollection R-1009\". Must be a complete case identifier including spaces and special characters."New value: +"Related case ID to be removed from the primary case. Example: \"ON6E5R-DIYRecipe-Work-RecipeCollection R-1009\". a complete case identifier including spaces and special characters."
    • addedInput schema / properties / sessionCredentials
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional session-specific credentials. If not provided, uses environment variables. Supports two authentication modes: (1) OAuth mode - provide baseUrl, clientId, and clientSecret, or (2) Token mode - provide baseUrl and accessToken.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "accessToken": {
      +      "description": "Direct access token (required for token mode)",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "apiVersion": {
      +      "default": "v2",
      +      "description": "API version (optional, defaults to v2)",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "baseUrl": {
      +      "description": "Pega base URL (required if providing credentials)",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "clientId": {
      +      "description": "OAuth2 client ID (required for OAuth mode)",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "clientSecret": {
      +      "description": "OAuth2 client secret (required for OAuth mode)",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "sessionId": {
      +      "description": "Optional session ID. If not provided, a new session will be created.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "tokenExpiry": {
      +      "description": "Token expiry in seconds from now (optional for token mode)",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the high-level action without detailing side effects, error conditions (e.g., non-existent relationship), permissions, reversibility, or impact on related data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 13 words, front-loaded with purpose. Every word is necessary and there is no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and a mutation tool, the description is too brief. It does not explain return values, error handling, or prerequisites (e.g., that the relationship must exist). More behavioral context is needed for safe invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are already documented. The description adds 'by deleting a specific relationship' which reinforces the purpose but does not add new semantic details beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Remove', the resource 'related work association between two cases', and the mechanism 'deleting a specific relationship'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'relate_cases' (adds relationship) and 'get_related_cases' (lists relationships).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'relate_cases' or 'delete_case_follower'. Context signals show many sibling tools for case operations, but the description does not help the agent choose correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/marco-looy/pega-dx-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server