Install Theme

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without explaining side effects, such as whether the theme is downloaded from the WordPress repository, whether it becomes active after installation, or what happens if the theme already exists. This is a significant gap for a mutation-type operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the essential action. However, it is so brief that it borders on under-specification, though for the purpose of this dimension, conciseness is excellent and structure is straightforward.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema and no annotations, the description needs to explain more about the tool's behavior and prerequisites. It does not mention how the theme slug is obtained, what the response will look like, or whether any post-install steps (like activation) are required. The description is too sparse to be fully complete for an agent to invoke the tool with confidence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% coverage for all three parameters (theme slug, software identifier, username), each with a brief description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Since schema descriptions already clarify the parameters, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate, but the description does not enhance understanding or provide usage examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb and resource: 'Install a WordPress theme.' It distinguishes from sibling tools like wp_themes_activate, wp_themes_update, and wp_themes_uninstall by focusing on the installation action. However, it lacks any additional context such as the source of the theme or the hosting account scope, so it doesn't fully reach the level of specificity shown in high-quality examples.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that users should first search for a theme using wp_themes_list_available or that installation is a prerequisite for activation. There are no exclusions or 'when not to use' instructions, leaving the agent without context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.