Create Digital Product

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Create a digital product,' without mentioning side effects, permissions, validation rules, or what happens on creation. This is minimal and leaves the agent without expectations beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded with the action. Every word is relevant, but it is perhaps too terse to be fully helpful, which prevents a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create operation with a fully documented schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context about store requirements, return values, or how digital products differ from physical ones. Given the presence of a sibling tool, this gap makes the description incomplete in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with every parameter (name, price, store_id, description) having a one-line description. The tool description adds no additional meaning to the parameters, but since the schema already documents them, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Create') and resource ('digital product in a store'), which is specific enough to understand the tool's basic function. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool ecommerce_products_create_physical beyond the word 'digital' in the tool name itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the sibling ecommerce_products_create_physical. There are no stated alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions, so the description offers no decision support beyond the obvious action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.