Build Node.js Assets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It does not mention side effects, whether the build is synchronous, or potential impact on the website. This is a significant gap for an action that likely modifies deployment state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Exactly one sentence with no filler. It is appropriately concise and front-loaded, earning its place without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, the description should at least indicate what a successful build returns, whether it is asynchronous, or what next steps are. It only states the action, leaving out expected results and operational context, making it incomplete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the only parameter (website_uid) with a description, so baseline 3 applies. The description adds only a bit of domain context ('Agency Plan website') but does not explain how the parameter affects the build or how to use it beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Build) and target (Node.js assets for an Agency Plan website). It is a specific verb+resource construction that distinguishes the tool from many siblings, though it does not explicitly name alternative tools for contrast.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description gives no context about prerequisites, timing, or related tools like hosting_nodejs_build_* or agency_website_processes, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.