Get phpMyAdmin Link

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'Get a link' with no mention of whether this is a read-only operation, if special permissions are needed, if the link expires, or if any state changes occur. The description offers minimal behavioral context beyond the action itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence and is concise with no wasted words. However, it largely restates the title ('Get phpMyAdmin Link') and adds only 'access' and 'for a database,' which provides minimal additional structure or information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is underspecified. It does not explain what the phpMyAdmin link is, how it will be returned, or any prerequisites. Given the tool's simplicity, some context about usage or return format is still expected; this description falls short.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for both parameters ('Database name' and 'Hosting account username'), covering 100% of the schema. The description adds no additional meaning about the parameters or their relationship, so it scores at the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action: 'Get a phpMyAdmin access link for a database.' It identifies a distinct purpose among sibling hosting_db_* tools (list/create/delete/repair), making it easy to distinguish. Though it's brief, it fully conveys the tool's function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives. It does not mention that this is for accessing a database via phpMyAdmin, nor does it distinguish from tools like hosting_db_remote_create or hosting_db_list. No exclusions or conditions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.