Disable Privacy Protection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose effects. It only states the action without explaining the consequences, such as making WHOIS data public or potential exposure of contact information. This is inadequate for a mutation that reverses a privacy feature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that gets straight to the point. No unnecessary words or filler, making it concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the tool is simple with one parameter, the description lacks any information about the result or side effects of disabling privacy. Given there is no output schema, the description should at least mention what happens after the operation, such as the domain's WHOIS becoming public. This is a significant gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter `domain` is fully described in the schema as 'Domain name', and the description adds no further detail. With 100% schema coverage, a baseline of 3 is appropriate; the description does not enhance the schema's parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Disable' and the resource 'WHOIS privacy protection', making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It also distinguishes from the sibling tool `domains_enable_privacy` by indicating the opposite action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used when the user wants to remove privacy protection from a domain, but it does not explicitly state when to use it or mention alternatives like `domains_enable_privacy`. Usage is only implied, not explicitly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.