Get WP Settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Get', implying a read-only operation, but does not disclose what settings are returned, whether any side effects occur, or if any special permissions are needed. This is insufficient for a getter tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence with no redundant words. It is concise and front-loaded, earning a high score for efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema, but the description does not explain what 'WordPress settings' includes or what the response will look like. Since no output schema exists, the description should compensate by outlining return values, but it does not. This leaves the agent with incomplete information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema lists a single parameter 'website_uid' with description 'Website UID', which is essentially the parameter name restated. The tool description does not explain what a website_uid is, how to obtain it, or its format. High schema coverage is technically met, but the added meaning is negligible.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Get WordPress settings for an Agency Plan website.' It uses a specific verb (Get) and resource (WordPress settings) with context (Agency Plan). It does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like agency_website_get, but the focus on 'settings' and 'Agency Plan' provides reasonable clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions. The description only states what it does, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name and context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.