get_product_main_image
Retrieve the primary image associated with a product by providing its unique product ID.
Instructions
Get the main image of a product
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| productId | Yes | Product ID |
Retrieve the primary image associated with a product by providing its unique product ID.
Get the main image of a product
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| productId | Yes | Product ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only states 'get', implying a read operation, but does not describe response format (e.g., URL, binary), error handling, or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words. Concisely states the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal but adequate. Lacks info on response type or edge cases, which would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, with a single parameter productId described as 'Product ID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get the main image of a product' clearly identifies the action and resource. It differentiates from siblings like 'get_product_secondary_image' via the name, but does not explicitly state the distinction.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., list_product_images, get_product_secondary_image). The description does not provide context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iamsamuelfraga/mcp-holded'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server