Skip to main content
Glama

resource_manage

Search, inspect, assign, and create resources in the Godot editor. Specialized operations for curves, environments, physics shapes, gradients, and noise textures.

Instructions

Resource (asset) search, inspection, assignment, and creation. Covers generic Resource subclasses plus specialized authoring (Curve, Environment, physics shapes, gradient/noise textures).

Ops: • search(type="", path="", offset=0, limit=100) Search for resources by type or path. Type matching includes subclasses. At least one filter required. Paginated. • load(path) Inspect a .tres / .res — returns type and editor-visible properties. • assign(path, property, resource_path) Load and assign a resource to a node property. Undoable. • get_info(type) Introspect a Resource class — properties, parent, abstract flag, concrete_subclasses (for abstract bases). Read-only. • create(type, properties=None, path="", property="", resource_path="", overwrite=False) Instantiate a Resource subclass. Either path+property (assign to a node, undoable) or resource_path (save to .tres). For specific families (Curve, Environment, etc.) prefer the dedicated ops. • curve_set_points(points, path="", property="", resource_path="") Replace all points on a Curve / Curve2D / Curve3D. Auto-creates the curve resource if the slot is empty (curve_created flag). • environment_create(path="", preset="default", properties=None, sky=None, resource_path="", overwrite=False) Build Environment + Sky chain. Presets: default | clear | sunset | night | fog. sky may be bool or a procedural sky dict such as {"sky_material": "procedural", "sky_top_color": "#0f172a"}. Either assign to a WorldEnvironment node or save .tres. • physics_shape_autofit(path, source_path="", shape_type="") Size a CollisionShape2D/3D to a nearby visual's bounds. Searches direct siblings then parent-siblings (handles nested Body→Collision layouts). Ambiguous matches return candidate paths in error.data.candidates. Auto-creates the concrete Shape subclass if needed. shape_type accepts either the short form ("box", "sphere", "capsule", "cylinder" for 3D; "rectangle", "circle", "capsule" for 2D) or the matching Godot class name ("BoxShape3D", "RectangleShape2D", etc.). • gradient_texture_create(stops, width=256, height=1, fill="linear", path="", property="", resource_path="", overwrite=False) Build GradientTexture2D from color stops. fill: linear | radial | square. • noise_texture_create(noise_type="simplex_smooth", width=512, height=512, frequency=0.01, seed=0, fractal_octaves=0, path="", property="", resource_path="", overwrite=False) Build NoiseTexture2D wrapping FastNoiseLite. Noise types: simplex | simplex_smooth | perlin | cellular | value | value_cubic.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
opYes
paramsNo
session_idNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses read-only operations (get_info, load), undoable actions, auto-creation, and error handling for ambiguous matches. Does not explicitly mention destructive behavior, but most ops are non-destructive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is well-structured with bullet points for each operation and front-loaded general purpose. Slightly lengthy but every part adds necessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (10 operations with many parameters) and presence of output schema, description covers all operations adequately without need to explain return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description compensates fully by detailing each operation's parameters, accepted values, and constraints (e.g., search filters, shape_type short forms). Adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it covers resource search, inspection, assignment, and creation. Lists specific operations with verbs and resources, effectively distinguishing from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear guidance for each operation, including constraints like 'At least one filter required' for search and preferences for dedicated ops. Lacks explicit when-not usage for other sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hi-godot/godot-ai'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server