set_graphics_white_luminance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It reveals nothing about side effects, required context, return values, or potential impacts on the project. This is a complete lack of transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, but it is under-specified. It adds no information beyond the tool name, so the brevity is not effective conciseness—it is a lack of substance. A concise description should be informative, which this is not.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (a specific Premiere Pro setting), no annotations, no output schema, and no parameter context, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain what 'graphics white luminance' means, what values it accepts, or what the expected outcome is.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Context signals indicate 0 parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%. With no parameters to describe, the description does not need to explain them. The provided schema is permissive but not requiring any properties, so the baseline of 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Premiere Pro expanded operation: set graphics white luminance,' which essentially restates the tool name with a generic 'expanded operation' prefix. It identifies the action (set) and resource (graphics white luminance) but provides no explanation of what this setting is, making it a tautology rather than a meaningful clarification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool or how it differs from alternatives. The sibling tool get_graphics_white_luminance is not mentioned, and no context is given about appropriate scenarios or prerequisites for setting graphics white luminance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.