set_clip_speed_qe

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It fails to state what the tool actually does beyond a vague name repetition, whether it modifies clip speed, what side effects it might have, or any required context. This is a complete absence of behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but it is under-specified rather than appropriately concise. Every word is generic filler ('Premiere Pro expanded operation') that adds no value, while the core content is just a repeat of the name. It lacks the substance needed to be an effective description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (an operation in Premiere Pro with many sibling tools), no annotations, and no output schema, the description should explain what 'qe' means, what the operation does, when to use it, and any side effects. It provides none of this, making it profoundly incomplete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero defined parameters, and the schema covers everything (schema_description_coverage is 100%). With no parameters, the baseline is 4; the description does not need to explain parameters, and it does not introduce any confusion in this respect.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'set clip speed qe' is essentially a restatement of the tool name, with the generic prefix 'Premiere Pro expanded operation' adding no specificity. It provides a verb and resource but fails to explain what 'qe' means or how it differs from similar tools like speed_change. This is tautological in nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as speed_change or get_clip_speed. The description does not mention any context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent without a basis for choosing it correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.