get_graphics_white_luminance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description must bear the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but it merely states 'get' without mentioning whether it returns a value, what that value represents, or any side effects. The description provides no meaningful behavioral information beyond the tool name, leaving the agent entirely in the dark.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief, but the phrase 'Premiere Pro expanded operation' is filler and the rest is a tautology. It is under-specified rather than concise, failing to earn its place because it adds no informative value beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

As a getter with no output schema, the description must explain what the tool returns. It does not describe the meaning, units, range, or format of 'white luminance,' leaving the agent without any understanding of the expected result. The description is inadequate even for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4 per the rubric. There are no parameter descriptions needed, and schema coverage is trivially 100%. The description does not need to add parameter meaning because there are none.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description simply restates the tool name ('get graphics white luminance') with the generic prefix 'Premiere Pro expanded operation,' providing no explanation of what white luminance is or what the get operation does. It does not distinguish this tool from the sibling setter, making it a tautological statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool, what prerequisites exist, or why it might be preferred over alternatives like set_graphics_white_luminance. The description lacks any contextual hint about appropriate usage, so it offers no actionable direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.