set_clip_volume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only restates the action. It does not mention side effects, whether it reads or writes, required permissions, or return values. The behavior remains opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but the phrase 'Premiere Pro expanded operation' is filler that does not earn its place. The core 'set clip volume' is concise, but the added context is vague and unhelpful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the tool's apparent simplicity, the description omits essential details such as how volume is provided, whether it modifies the selected clip, and what happens on execution. The permissive schema with no properties further complicates understanding, making the description incomplete for reliable invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters defined in the schema, so the description does not need to compensate for missing parameter documentation. The baseline of 4 applies, though the description also does not clarify how volume is specified or whether the tool uses current selection.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the operation as setting clip volume with a specific verb ('set') and resource ('clip volume'). However, it does not distinguish this tool from closely related siblings like set_clip_opacity or adjust_audio_levels, and the phrase 'expanded operation' adds no clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, selection requirements, or context such as whether it applies to selected clips or requires explicit parameters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.