Skip to main content
Glama
hermoso-ai

Hermoso

Official

Duplicate a scheduled post

duplicate_scheduled

Copy an existing scheduled or published post into a new queued post to reuse winning creative. Override captions, media, channels, or scheduling as needed.

Instructions

Copy an existing scheduled or already-published post into a NEW queued post — the way to run a creative again, reuse a post that worked as the starting point for the next one, or re-send something after it went out. It copies the caption, media, per-channel captions, title, description, tags and the target board / Page / company Page / listing, and ANY of those can be overridden in the same call. Give a new time in at, or useQueue:true to drop it into the brand’s next free posting slot. The copy is INDEPENDENT — editing or cancelling it never touches the original — and it is a genuinely new post rather than a re-send, so it publishes even where the original already did. To re-fire only the channels that FAILED, use retry_scheduled instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
atNowhen the copy goes out — ISO timestamp or epoch milliseconds (default: an hour from now)
idYesthe post to copy, from list_scheduled
linkNo
titleNo
chatIdNoTELEGRAM — which chat, group or channel the copy goes to (@username or numeric id)
pageIdNoFACEBOOK / INSTAGRAM / THREADS — which connected Page (list_meta_pages)
boardIdNoPINTEREST — the board for the copy (list_pinterest_boards)
messageNoa different caption for the copy
captionsNoper-channel caption overrides for the copy
channelsNopost the copy to these channels instead of the original’s
imageUrlNo
timezoneNoIANA zone for the queue, e.g. "America/New_York"
useQueueNoinstead of naming a time, take the brand’s next free posting slot
videoUrlNo
imageUrlsNoCAROUSEL — an ORDERED list of image URLs published as ONE swipeable post
locationIdNoGOOGLE BUSINESS — which listing (list_business_locations)
visibilityNo
linkedinOrganizationIdNoLINKEDIN — publish the copy as this company Page (list_linkedin_pages)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.1.161

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes beyond the sparse annotations by disclosing that the copy is independent, never affects the original, and is a genuinely new post that will publish even where the original already did. These are exactly the non-obvious behaviors an agent needs to know, and nothing contradicts the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is substantial but every sentence carries distinct information: purpose, use cases, copying/override behavior, new post independence, and the retry alternative. It is front-loaded with the core operation and uses formatting like INDEPENDENT and NEW to emphasize key facts without wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 18 parameters, nested objects, and no output schema, the description covers the essential invocation semantics well: required source id, scheduling options, override behavior, and relationship to retry_scheduled. The only small gap is that return values are not mentioned, but this does not block correct selection or invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 72%, so the schema already documents most parameters. The description adds valuable meaning for the key scheduling choices ('Give a new time in at, or useQueue:true') and clarifies that any copied field can be overridden in the same call. A few schema-undocumented parameters like link and imageUrl remain implicit, but the core semantics are well covered.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: copying an existing scheduled or already-published post into a NEW queued post. It clearly distinguishes itself from the sibling retry_scheduled, so an agent can tell them apart immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives the concrete scenarios for using this tool (reuse a post, run a creative again, re-send after publishing) and explicitly says to use retry_scheduled instead when only failed channels need to be re-fired. This is clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools