Delete a creator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds valuable behavioral detail beyond the annotations: it records a cross-device delete to prevent reappearance, it only removes the roster entry rather than affecting ads, and it clarifies no confirmation is needed because the creator can be saved again. This fully explains the destructive-but-reversible nature of the operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tightly packed sentences lead with the core action, then clarify scope, side effects, and re-creation path. No filler, and each sentence adds relevant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with rich annotations and no output schema, this description is complete. It tells the agent what the tool affects, what it does not affect, how the id is obtained, and how the action can be reversed. Nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents the 'id' parameter as 'the creator id (from list_creators)'. The description reiterates this source but does not add new parameter-level detail, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Remove'), a specific resource ('a saved creator from this workspace's cast'), and an explicit identifier source ('by id (from list_creators)'). It clearly distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like save_creator and list_creators.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context for when to use the tool: removing a creator from the workspace cast by id. It also explicitly tells the agent what this tool does NOT do (ads already rendered are untouched) and names save_creator as the way to re-add the same portrait, effectively covering alternatives and exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.