Skip to main content
Glama
hermoso-ai

Hermoso

Official

Create a Drive folder

create_drive_folder

Create a Google Drive folder, optionally nested under a parent ID, to organize saved files. Get the folder ID and link to use as a move target or parent for nested folders.

Instructions

Create a folder in the user’s Google Drive (optionally nested under parentId) to organize saved files. Returns the folder id + webViewLink. Use that ID as update_drive_file’s moveToFolderId or as parentId for a nested folder. NOTE: save_to_drive’s folder is a NAME, not this id — it find-or-creates a folder by that name, so pass the folder NAME there (or omit and just save, then move with update_drive_file).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesfolder name
parentIdNoparent folder id for a nested folder (default: Drive root)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.1.161
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      -  "additionalProperties": false,
      -  "properties": {
      -    "id": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "name": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "webViewLink": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  2. Addedv0.1.15

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already signal non-read-only and non-idempotent behavior, and the description adds the return format (folder id + webViewLink) plus how the ID flows to sibling tools. It also clarifies the find-or-create behavior of save_to_drive, which is useful context beyond the structured annotations. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each with distinct value: purpose, return value and downstream usage, and a cross-tool caveat. No filler and the core action is front-loaded. It is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter create tool with no output schema, the description covers the return value, nesting behavior, and downstream consumption examples. It also addresses the confusing relationship with save_to_drive, making the tool effectively self-contained. An agent can call this correctly without additional clarification.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both name and parentId documented, so the schema carries the basic meaning. The description goes further by explaining that parentId creates a nested folder (defaulting to root) and that the returned ID is used downstream. This adds practical parameter usage that the schema alone does not provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Create a folder in the user's Google Drive' — a specific verb and resource — and clarifies it can be nested under parentId. It clearly distinguishes itself from related tools like save_to_drive and update_drive_file by explaining the folder creation role. Unambiguous and immediately actionable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells the agent to use the returned ID as update_drive_file's moveToFolderId or as parentId for a nested folder. It also warns that save_to_drive's folder parameter takes a NAME, not this ID, steering the agent away from a common misuse. This provides direct alternative routing and practical context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools