get_teams_by_season_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description does not disclose pagination behavior despite 'all teams' in text and page/per_page parameters present. It also omits details on rate limits, permissions, or error handling, leaving the agent under-informed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is direct and front-loaded. It avoids fluff but is perhaps too minimal. Every word earns its place, though more context could improve without excessive length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 8 parameters including pagination, filtering, and includes, the description is very sparse. It fails to explain how to use advanced features or what the response contains. No output schema exists, so the description should cover more of the tool's behavior and options.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 8 parameters. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond 'season' context. Baseline of 3 applies since schema carries the burden, but no extra value from description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'all teams participating in a specific season'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_all_teams' (no filter) and 'get_teams_by_country_id' (different filter).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a season_id is known, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'get_all_teams' or 'get_teams_by_country_id'. No exclusions or when-not-to-use guidance provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.