get_all_historical_odds

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description mentions pagination but fails to disclose other behavioral traits such as authentication needs, rate limits, or read-only nature. The adjective 'historical' and 'premium' hint at data scope but are insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words, front-loaded with main action and key qualifiers.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters and no output schema, description could elaborate on historical date range, typical response size, or hints on using filters; current level is minimal but not insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are fully described in the schema. Description adds no additional meaning beyond what is already in the parameter descriptions, meeting baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Get' and resource 'historical premium pre-match odds' with pagination noted, clearly distinguishing it from siblings like get_all_premium_odds (likely current) and get_all_inplay_odds.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for retrieving historical premium pre-match odds, but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance vs. similar tools like get_all_premium_odds or get_prematch_odds_by_fixture_id.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.