get_state_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description provides no behavioral details beyond the basic action. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, what happens if the ID is not found, or any side effects. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries full burden but is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (6 words, one sentence), but it lacks structure and sufficient informativeness for a tool with 7 parameters. While no filler is present, the brevity sacrifices clarity, making it minimally adequate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, pagination, filtering behavior, or any other contextual details. Essential information is missing for effective tool usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers all 7 parameters (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning for parameters like 'include', 'select', 'filters', etc. It only mentions 'by ID', which is redundant with the required parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the resource ('specific fixture state') identified by ID. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_all_states' by specifying 'by ID' and the resource name, but could be more specific about the entity type. The name 'state' is generic, but the description adds 'fixture state' to clarify.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_all_states' or other get-by-id tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or context for its appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.