get_latest_totw

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations and only a one-line description, there is no disclosure of behavioral traits. The description does not mention that the response likely returns a list (implied by pagination parameters), ordering, or what 'latest' means in terms of update frequency. The agent has no insight into side effects, rate limits, or result structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one sentence), but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. It lacks necessary details that would make it informative. Every sentence should earn its place, and here the single sentence does not sufficiently convey the tool's scope or behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 optional parameters, no output schema, and related siblings, the description is incomplete. It does not clarify if 'latest' refers to global or league-specific, or whether this is a filtered subset. Important aspects like pagination, field selectivity, and localization are not addressed, leaving agents with significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all six parameters (include, select, filters, locale, page, per_page) with descriptions. The tool description adds no additional semantic context; it does not explain how these parameters affect 'latest' selection or provide examples. Thus it meets the baseline but adds no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get the latest Team of the Week' clearly states the verb 'Get' and the specific resource 'latest Team of the Week'. It immediately distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_all_totws' (all) and 'get_totw_by_round_id' (by ID), making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives. The description does not mention scenarios such as needing the most recent TOTW, nor does it exclude cases where a specific round or all TOTWs are required. Without usage context, agents may not know if this is the right tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.