get_all_livescores

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses the timeframe scope but fails to mention any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or that it is a read-only operation. Agent lacks insight into potential side effects or constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is clear, direct, and without redundancy. Every word contributes to the purpose. Excellent efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description is brief given the tool has 5 optional parameters and no output schema. While it clarifies the timeframe, it does not explain what data is returned (e.g., participant, score details) or how parameters like include/select affect output. Agent may need to infer behavior from parameter names alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions already present. The tool description adds no additional meaning to parameters beyond what the schema provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as description does not enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Get all livescores' with specific timeframe ('15 minutes before kick-off until 15 minutes after full-time'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_inplay_livescores' and 'get_latest_livescores' which cover different time windows or subsets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage for livescores within the defined timeframe but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_inplay_livescores for currently in-play matches). No when-not-to-use or alternative recommendations are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.