get_all_inplay_odds

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Get all available inplay odds' without mentioning pagination, rate limits, or that it supports filters via parameters. The presence of page and per_page parameters suggests pagination, but this is not described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (one sentence) but lacks structural elements. It is front-loaded with the core action but does not include any additional sentences that would justify its brevity. It is not verbose, but it omits important context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 6 parameters, lack of output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the return format, pagination behavior, or how filters affect results. More details are needed for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add any extra meaning beyond what the parameter names and schema descriptions provide. It does not explain how to compose the include or filters parameters effectively.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action and resource: 'Get all available inplay odds.' It is specific and tells what the tool does. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_inplay_odds_by_fixture_id, which also retrieve inplay odds but with filtering.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as filtering by fixture or bookmaker. There are many sibling tools with overlapping functionality, and the description offers no guidance on selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.