get_last_updated_inplay_odds

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It states a time window (last 10 seconds) but does not disclose pagination, rate limits, or how parameters like filters/select affect the result. The tool likely returns multiple records, but the description is silent on ordering or duplication.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, not verbose. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness. Front-loaded with the key verb and time constraint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is too brief. It does not cover typical use cases, error scenarios, or data freshness guarantees. A real-time tool like this benefits from explicit behavioral notes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no context beyond the schema; it does not explain how 'include', 'select', 'filters', etc., interact with the 'last 10 seconds' scope. No enrichment.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns inplay odds updated in the last 10 seconds. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_all_inplay_odds' (full list) and 'get_last_updated_prematch_odds' (prematch). However, the phrase 'inplay odds' could be more specific about what exactly is returned (e.g., fixtures with odds).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as 'get_all_inplay_odds' for a broader set or 'get_inplay_odds_by_fixture_id' for a specific match. The description omits context on when this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.